Search results
{ Distance methods with properly corrected distances are Robustness: how much is it hurt by a wrong model? { Distance methods can be highly vulnerable { Parsimony is more robust Power: how well can it do with limited data? Speed: can I stand to run it? { Methods that are consistent, robust and powerful tend to be slow
Distance matrices are used in phylogeny as non-parametric distance methods and were originally applied to phenetic data using a matrix of pairwise distances. These distances are then reconciled to produce a tree (a phylogram, with informative branch lengths).
Distance matrix methods. A major family of phylogenetic methods has been the distance matrix methods, intro duced by Cavalli-Sforza and Edwards (1967) and by Fitch and Margoliash (1967; see also Horne, 1967). They were influenced by the clustering algorithms of Sokal and Sneath (1963).
Distance-based phylogeny problem. Input: distance matrix of pairwise distances for N species. Goal: find a tree consistent with the distance matrix. This means that the sum of edge lengths connecting each pair of leaves ij corresponds to a distance Mij.
29 lip 2011 · Here we propose a new way to obtain Euclidean phylogenetic distance matrices. It only requires taking the elementwise square root of the patristic phylogenetic distance matrix. We demonstrate that this “new distance” is always Euclidean and that this property is also true for unrooted trees and for trees harboring polytomies.
Flow charts for calculating the distance matrix and comparing the recovered phylogenies. (A) Calculate Distance Matrix: Start with two FASTA files of the DNA coding sequences of two species....
11 kwi 2012 · Among its features, it has a strong distance-based component allowing the user to compute distances from aligned DNA sequences based on most methods from the literature and also build phylogenetic trees from them.
