Yahoo Poland Wyszukiwanie w Internecie

Search results

  1. 14 mar 2020 · Psychological distance is a tool for assessing the fit or integration between the perceptual subject and object, which is an important determinant of whether primary, essential characteristics or secondary, peripheral characteristics are used as the basis for evaluation.

  2. 16 paź 2014 · We will first conceptualize a formal definition of psychological distance and then review evidence supporting the association among different dimensions of distance and the interchangeability of these distances.

  3. The research reviewed here suggests that psychological distance, as conceptualized here, captures a fundamental aspect of meaning common to all distances and may provide a unifying framework for understanding a wide range of seemingly unrelated psychological phenomena.

  4. Psychological distance is defined within the Construal-Level Theory (CLT), which was developed by Trope and Liberman ( 2003 ). Their first approach referred only to the temporal distance and assumed that we judge a more distant event in time by few abstract characteristics ( high - level construal ). On the opposite, one judges an event which ...

  5. 19 lis 2020 · Introduction. The theory of the Construal Level explains that there is a relation among the psychological distance and response of people to a specific event ( Liberman and Trope, 1998, 2003 ). The psychological distance is composed of four dimensions: spatial, social, temporal, and hypothetical ( Liberman et al., 2007; Liberman and Trope, 2008 ).

  6. 1 gru 2021 · The psychological distance of objects (e.g., things, places, other people) affects how we think about them. Research suggests that psychological proximity and distance might be also related to positive and negative evaluations, respectively.

  7. 19 lut 2021 · Unlike other cost measures, the cognitive distance estimate integrates systematically observed distortions and biases in spatial cognition. As a proof-of-concept, the framework is implemented for 26 cities worldwide using open data, producing a novel comparative measure of ‘cognitive accessibility’.