Search results
14 mar 2020 · At present, research on psychological distance has identified four major dimensions: spatial distance, temporal distance, social distance, and hypotheticality (Trope and Liberman 2010). The dimensions of psychological distance interact with one another; i.e., a change in one of the distance dimensions affects the perception of other distance ...
13 gru 2011 · The extant literature defines psychological distance as “the different ways in which an object might be removed from” the self along dimensions such as “time, space, social distance, and hypotheticality” (Trope and Liberman 2010, 440).
The research reviewed here suggests that psychological distance, as conceptualized here, captures a fundamental aspect of meaning common to all distances and may provide a unifying framework for understanding a wide range of seemingly unrelated psychological phenomena.
19 lis 2020 · The psychological distance is composed of four dimensions: spatial, social, temporal, and hypothetical (Liberman et al., 2007; Liberman and Trope, 2008). Each dimension is interrelated to the others (Fiedler et al., 2012), despite the lack of commonalities (Trope and Liberman, 2012).
Rather than assessing sensitivity to distance in a choice paradigm, each of these studies instead examine how initial dis-tancing (socially, probabilistically) reduces direct magnitude esti-mation of further distance (i.e., time) but not for nondistance intervals.
Definition. Psychological distance is a cognitive separation between the self and other instances such as persons, events, or times. Description. Dimensions. Psychological distance is defined within the Construal-Level Theory (CLT), which was developed by Trope and Liberman ( 2003 ).
This study used Citespace, Bibexcel, and Netdraw to construct scientific maps and performed co-word analysis, social network analysis, and cluster analysis of data from 1371 published studies on psychological distance that were retrieved from the Web of Science database.
