Search results
3 kwi 2018 · Sexual assault (SA) in the U.S. military is a significant public health concern 1 – 3 with wide ranging consequences. 4 – 7 The prevalence rate of SA during military service range from 4 to 7% among women and 1 to 2% among men, 8, 9 exceeding the prevalence rate among same-age civilian populations. 9, 10 These data are concerning, as the number ...
22 lut 2021 · This article explores intra-service rape in branches of the U.S. military from the 1990s to the present. The article begins by establishing the parameters of the crisis of sexual abuse within the U.S. armed services. Second, it explores systematic failures to recognize forms of suffering.
9 kwi 2023 · This research and policy agenda linked military sexual assault to psychological trauma, moral injury, and physical combat risks, which has clear and urgent implications for many service-disabled veterans or those with mental health needs, however this narrow focus on military-specific forms of trauma (and the related research funding priorities ...
2 lut 2022 · We defined several composite measures based on four forms of aggression occurring in the military context in the last 12 months: receipt of repeated sexual comments, unwanted verbal sexual attention, sexual coercion, and sexual assault (unwanted touching, attempted rape or forced sex).
1 sty 2016 · With regard to the interrelationship between sexual harassment and sexual assault in the military, there are three important goals that need to be addressed in future research: (1) explicate the dynamics of sexual harassment as a precursor to sexual assault, (2) document commonalities across risk factors for both sexual harassment and assault ...
12 paź 2017 · This article discusses the scope and impact of military sexual trauma (MST) in the U.S. Armed Forces. The authors explore aspects of the military setting that may make recovery from this form of sexual violence particularly difficult.
Sexual assault within the ranks is legally subject to punishment under the military code of justice, draws unwelcome congressional scrutiny, and is a source of ongoing negative publicity. Its persistence within a hier-archical, professional, and highly institutionalized state military thus poses a puzzle.
