Search results
Brief Fact Summary. The Petitioner, John W. Terry (the “Petitioner”), was stopped and searched by an officer after the officer observed the Petitioner seemingly casing a store for a potential robbery. The officer approached the Petitioner for questioning and decided to search him first.
13 mar 2017 · Terry v. Ohio was the landmark case that provided the name for the “Terry stop.” It established the constitutionality of a limited search for weapons when an officer has reasonable suspicion to believe a crime is afoot based on the circumstances.
Terry v. Ohio Case Brief Example. Written by Milo Lawson in Case Briefs. The following case brief for Terry v. Ohio (1968) provides a concise and structured summary of the court case that serves as a valuable reference tool for law students and legal professionals.
Get Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1866, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889 (1968), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.
21 lut 2024 · Quick Summary. Terry (defendant) and Chilton were observed by a police officer and suspected of planning a robbery. Upon confrontation and a pat-down search by the officer, weapons were found on both men, leading to charges against them. The legal dispute centered on whether the search violated the Fourth Amendment.
Summary of the Case Clarence Brandenburg, a leader of a Ku Klux Klan (KKK) in a rural part of Ohio, contacted a reporter for news coverage of a rally happening in Hamilton in the summer of 1964. Several prominent local KKK members delivered speeches during the event, one of them being Brandenburg.
Terry v. Ohio Case Brief Summary: In this case, a policeman's "stop and frisk" action, based on suspicion that a man was armed and involved in criminal activity, led to a critical debate on Fourth Amendment rights.
