Search results
Abstract. People are capable of thinking about the future, the past, remote locations, another person’s perspective, and counterfactual alternatives. Without denying the uniqueness of each process, it is proposed that they constitute different forms of traversing psychological distance.
Psychological distance is defined within the Construal-Level Theory (CLT), which was developed by Trope and Liberman . Their first approach referred only to the temporal distance and assumed that we judge a more distant event in time by few abstract characteristics (high-level construal).
1 kwi 2010 · Psychological distance is egocentric: Its reference point is the self in the here and now, and the different ways in which an object might be removed from that point-in time, in space, in...
16 paź 2014 · Expanding from psychological distance to time perspective and the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory, we compare and contrast these frameworks. We highlight the insights to basic and applied psychology offered by both, and we propose that each has the potential to speak volumes the other.
13 gru 2011 · The extant literature defines psychological distance as “the different ways in which an object might be removed from” the self along dimensions such as “time, space, social distance, and hypotheticality” (Trope and Liberman 2010, 440).
In this paper, we have discussed the relationship between construal and four dimensions of psychological distance: temporal distance, spatial distance, social distance, and hypotheticality. Each of these dimensions is highly relevant to the psychology of consumer decision-making.
14 mar 2020 · At present, research on psychological distance has identified four major dimensions: spatial distance, temporal distance, social distance, and hypotheticality (Trope and Liberman 2010). The dimensions of psychological distance interact with one another; i.e., a change in one of the distance dimensions affects the perception of other distance ...
