Yahoo Poland Wyszukiwanie w Internecie

Search results

  1. 4 lut 2024 · If you prefer a more visual guidebook with easy-to-navigate maps and color-coded sections, Lonely Planet may be the better choice for you. However, if you enjoy reading in-depth descriptions and prefer a more traditional guidebook format, Rough Guide may be the better option.

  2. Rough Guides uses the entirety of the page when listing and describing the main sights and attractions of a place and only splits the page in two for dedicated sections such as “Arrival and Departure” (to and from a place), “Getting Around”, “Accommodation”, “Eating”.

  3. Has anyone used A Rough Guide To books in the past, and what do you think of them? I'm looking for a travel companion that is very similar to LP but more geered to the lower budget side, without all the high budget tier choices.

  4. I find my preference depends on location and the company's expertise. Lonely Planet is a good go to anywhere, especially in Asia where others are lacking (Indonesia). However Footprint is king in South America, and Moon dominates in North America. 1.

  5. Rough Guides: This British series is written by Europeans who understand the contemporary social scene better than most American writers. While their hotel listings can be skimpy and uninspired, the historical and sightseeing information tends to offer greater depth than others.

  6. 26 lut 2024 · When it comes to choosing travel guidebooks, two popular options that often come to mind are Lonely Planet and Rough Guides. Both are well-respected names in the travel industry, offering extensive resources for globetrotters seeking adventure around the world.

  7. 19 sty 2019 · “What the heck is the matter with Lonely Planet?” Is Lonely Planet still even good or relevant? While it’s still the largest guidebook company in the world with 25% of the market, it’s fallen from its perch as “the bible” for budget travelers.

  1. Ludzie szukają również