Search results
6 godz. temu · In the Rhetoric, Aristotle identifies the character of a communicator (ethos) as an effective means of persuasion, particularly when other means of persuasion—such as rational argument (logos) or emotional appeals (pathos)—are unavailable, ineffective, or inappropriate (Allen, 2004, pp. 141–144; Aristotle, 2006, 1.2.3-7). This insight is ...
6 godz. temu · For example, to analyze linguistic representations or discourses, the characteristics of a rhetorical expression are sometimes considered by the Aristotelian classifications of logos, pathos, and ethos. However, there are no meta-criteria for prioritizing the effectiveness of these different streams of rhetorical legitimacy.
6 godz. temu · Animal rhetoric questions that certain understanding and displaces dominant understandings of the where, how, and by whom of rhetoric. Displacing the human as the locus of rhetorical production (and thus knowledge), Hawhee’s (2017) history of rhetoric presses us to accept that more-than-human animals are partners in feeling who create rhetoric that exceeds human language games and linguistic ...
6 godz. temu · Invent or come up with a combination of persuasive appeals to logos, ethos, and pathos that are appropriate for your intended audience (see RC chapters 8 & 10). To do this, you’ll need to think carefully about your audience’s values, beliefs, and assumptions and attempt to find common ground.
